Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit declined to block the orders, according to the government’s emergency application filed with the Supreme Court. U.S. Solicitor General D.

Supreme Court on Friday did not issue its highly anticipated ruling on the legality of President Donald Trump’s tariffs, as administration officials have said they would still be able to impose the import taxes if the court doesn’t rule in their favor

Gun rights advocates argued in their petition for Supreme Court review that the lower courts wrongly applied the Supreme Court's landmark decision in a case known as Bruen, which requires courts to evaluate whether a restriction such as a high-capacity

They filed an emergency application with the Supreme Court on Oct. 30 after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on Aug. 18 gave control over the funds to the Philippines.

The province has applied to the Supreme Court of Canada, saying the case raises questions over whether courts can make declarations about laws limiting Charter rights when the notwithstanding clause has been invoked. 

The respondents had urged the Supreme Court to reject the petition in a brief filed on Oct. 8.

“And that’s true for the Supreme Court, and it’s also true for every district court, unless and until an appellate court or the Supreme Court says otherwise—that judicial orders are judicial orders and need to be respected.”

—The Wisconsin Supreme Court race has become a proxy battle for liberal and conservative donors who have spent more than $81 million in a contest both sides say will shape the future of the state and the nation.

The Supreme Court hears the Affordable Care Act case at 10 a.m. ET on April 21.

"The Court will convene for a public non-argument session in the Courtroom at 10 a.m.," says a notice on the Supreme Court website. "The Court may announce opinions." The Supreme Court heard arguments from each side in November.

The petition stated that the Sixth Circuit’s decision in the church case conflicted with precedents of the Supreme Court and of state and federal courts.

The Missouri Supreme Court on May 27 ordered a lower court judge in Jackson County to vacate previous rulings that had blocked the state’s abortion regulations from taking effect.

"The Supreme Court didn’t even address that," Bessent said, referring to the refunds. "The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.

The Appeals Court for the 1st Circuit upheld that block on Sept. 4. Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in the government’s petition to the Supreme Court that the block "has no basis in law or logic."

The Department of Justice (DOJ) urged the Supreme Court on July 24 to allow the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to move forward with the cancellation of research grants linked to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.

Supreme Court on May 27 turned away an appeal by Apache Indians who want to stop a copper mine from being developed on land they consider sacred. The court’s decision in Apache Stronghold v. United States took the form of an unsigned order.

The Supreme Court on July 24 paused a lower court ruling that prevents voters in seven states from suing over alleged discrimination under the federal Voting Rights Act. The U.S.

The Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the Tenth Circuit.

The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on Sept. 18 to grant an emergency order ousting Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, from her post.

The administration later filed a request with the Supreme Court seeking to stay Perry’s order, but the court has delayed the ruling. Matthew Vadum contributed to this report.

President Donald Trump has asked the Supreme Court to wade into his defamation dispute with author E. Jean Carroll, alleging that an appeals court failed to recognize multiple evidentiary flaws that led to an adverse verdict for him.

But the circuit court was “wrong,” the Supreme Court ruled. The nation’s highest court said it made it clear in Payne v.

The Supreme Court reversed a 2023 ruling of the U.S.

The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the cases by the end of June.

Sauer said in the Sept. 16 brief that the Supreme Court ruled in Seila Law v.

U.S. importers have applied for electronic refunds, pending a Supreme Court decision on the legality of Trump’s IEEPA tariffs.

According to the state supreme court, one justice did not participate in the decision, while another was disqualified. Georgia Supreme Court Justice Carla Wong McMillan said she would have taken up Willis’s appeal.

The Supreme Court on Nov. 6 allowed the Trump administration to enforce its policy requiring the sex designation on a U.S. passport to be consistent with the passport holder's sex at birth. The court's decision in Trump v.

The Supreme Court of Canada says a legal challenge to Saskatchewan’s pronoun law can proceed.

"In general, markets expect the Supreme Court to uphold the lower court ruling and invalidate the IEEPA tariffs," Essaye said in a note emailed to The Epoch Times.