Are Republican Attacks on MAGA Making Trump Only Stronger?; Chinese Scientists Create mRNA Cow Milk Vaccine

When Donald Trump ran for president in 2016, and eventually won, he did so with a key campaign promise: He said he’d “drain the swamp.” The initial sentiment after Trump left office was that he failed at this. The new sentiment is that he did in fact drain it, and now the nation is seeing all the swamp creatures that once hid below the surface. This is bringing about a new type of political debate for the country. Rather than being between Republicans and Democrats, it’s now between the “MAGA Republicans” and the establishment. And the anti-establishment camp is breaking from the old systems of information control.

Meanwhile, a group of Chinese scientists has made a breakthrough with new mRNA edible vaccines using cow milk. The study represents a major step for science and medicine, yet it is raising new concerns over the possibility of future vaccine mandates.

In this episode of Crossroads, we’ll discuss these stories.

–

TRANSCRIPT:

Good evening and welcome to Crossroads!

When Donald Trump ran for President in 2016 and eventually won, he did so with a key campaign promise: He said he’d “drain the swamp.”

Yet, as his supporters watched his time in office, they saw Trump continually attacked by the establishment media, they saw one fake hit piece after another rise and fall against him, and they watched as many of Trump’s appointees backstabbed and betrayed him.

Now they watch as the attacks against Trump continue. They watch as laws are altered to attempt to take Trump down – like District Attorney Alvin Bragg changing misdemeanors to a felony, without him even stating the law Trump broke to justify this. They watched the raid on Trump’s home at Mar-a-Lago get allowed after President Biden revoked Trump’s executive privilege, then as it turned out Biden and others had also taken classified documents home. And people generally expect they will continue to watch, as similar attacks like this emerge, all trying to take down Trump.

The initial sentiment after Trump left office was that he failed to “drain the swamp.” The new sentiment is that he did in fact drain it, and now the nation is seeing all the swamp creatures that once hid below the surface.

And they’re seeing something else: despite the near-constant attacks against him, and despite the establishment system in entertainment, politics, and media largely opposing him – like him or not – Trump is still the undisputed leader in Republican politics.

At least based on the polls. According to a Fox News survey of Republican primary voters, Trump has around 53 percent support, DeSantis has 21 percent, Pence is at 6 percent, Nikki Haley at 4 percent, and Ramaswamy at 3 percent. It says Greg Abbott, Chris Christie, Larry Elder, Chris Sununu and Glenn Youngkin have close to 1 percent support each. Then Asa Hutchinson, Kristi Noem, and Francis Suarez are at less than 1 percent.

In other words, there are many candidates running against Trump, each representing different ideas in Republican politics. But even if they were all combined together, Trump would still be in the lead. Ironically, the attacks on Trump seem to have helped him in the polls. Since February, DeSantis dropped 7 points, while Trump rose 10 points.

The numbers say more than just where Republicans stand on Trump though. This is much deeper. The numbers also show how Republicans view the weekly psyops being almost regularly flashed across the screens. The raid on Mar-a-Lago, Stormy Daniels and the Soros DA, the “insurrection,” narratives or “racism” and the “MAGA extremists!” None of these have turned people away from Trump. Again, rather than turn people away, they seem to be doing the opposite. In other words, people aren’t buying it. And when people don’t buy what just about every single “trustworthy” source says, well that’s gonna freak out the powers that be.

The reality is that MAGA, Trump’s movement to “Make American Great Again,” is really a whole new political party. It’s not quite Republican, and not quite Democrat. What it really represents is the anti-establishment policies of both the old Republicans and the old Democrats combined into a new movement. It’s “populism.” It’s everything that in old politics that made people feel their government represented their interests. And the old guard Republicans and Democrats, meanwhile, have been forced to both oppose this new party, while trying to maintain an identity of their own.

The result? They’ve transformed into the “uniparty,” the “globalists,” the “progressives” of transsexualism, race politics, and all the woke ideas that swept the country under Obama. They’re the “war party,” and ironically the party of corporatism and the global interests of finance such as with the World Economic Forum and its union with United Nations policy. In other words, it’s not a good image. At least, not if they’re trying to appeal to American interests.

Maybe this is why they’re so mad at Trump – they see him as the divider. He took the populist ideas from both sides of the aisle and combined them to create what is really a new party, within skin of the old party. He “stoles it from them!”

And it’s maybe for this reason that we see President Biden trying to flip the script. He’s now claiming it’s the Republicans, and not the Democrats, who are against securing the U.S.- Mexico border. He recently wrote this: “The House Republican proposal will gut funding for over 2,000 Customs and Border Protection agents in order to cut taxes for the rich. They just told Border Patrol that billionaires are more important than our national security.”

Biden claimed recently that it’s “MAGA Republicans” who want to defund the police. Watch:

Of course, Defund the Police was a Democrat Party policy and one of its lead slogans. Open borders is a Democrat policy, and the sanctuary cities that prevent the deportation of criminal aliens are also Democrat policies.

So why is Biden trying to convince people that the Democrat policies are actually Republican policies, or more specifically, MAGA policies? Well, probably because the establishment narratives aren’t working, and the “MAGA” policies look like they are.

This then brings up a tough issue. How can they flip the script if people can fact check them? How can they suddenly shift the narratives if popular news hosts don’t play by the rules, and expose the fake narratives being puppeted around? Well, they can’t. The polling for Trump shows that the ability of “mainstream influencers” to control the narrative has failed. People don’t believe them.

And so, the solution? Well, it seems the solution is to censor. To deplatform. To make sure any voice that would challenge the official narrative is not heard – or at the very least, very difficult to hear.

And this is how many of these “MAGA Republicans” are viewing the break between Fox News and Tucker Carlson, as well. Tucker was also a Trump phenomena, so to speak. His former show with Fox News, Tucker Carlson Tonight, first aired in November 2016, and he represented the MAGA opinions that began aligning Fox with the Trump movement. Others like him joined later, like Dan Bongino. They were seen as outside the “mainstream media” system, and were said to have had a good amount of autonomy on what they chose to cover and say. And the ousting of both of them is likewise being viewed as a purge, not just of MAGA news, but also of news coverage outside the control of the executives.

Yet, as with Trump, the attacks don’t seem to be stopping Tucker. And Tucker also looks like he’s moving closer to Trump. In fact, Washington Post claims it got a scoop that Tucker and Trump are now planning to hold an alternative Republican debate for 2024. Ah, that Trump. First he co opted the Republican Party. Now he’s co opting the debates.

If the takedown of Tucker was meant to purge Trump from the mainstream news cycle, well, as we’ve seen with all the other scandals, it looks like it may do just the opposite.

Stay tuned after the break. We’re gonna talk about how Chinese scientists have created mRNA cow’s milk vaccine

Welcome back!

Just a few days ago, President Joe Biden announced the official end of the COVID-19 vaccine mandates. This follows him ending the emergency declaration for COVID, and brings to an end the lockdowns, the mask mandates, and all the other authoritarian policies we saw under the pandemic. At least for now.

And as the powers that be tell us it’s time to move on, forgive and forget, and to please not sue them, many Americans are saying we need justice for the violations of constitutional rights that took place under the pandemic, lest it happen again. Interestingly, amidst this, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky announced today she’ll be stepping down from her position at the end of June.

But that justice may soon be necessary. Because pandemic or not, it seems we’re still living in the shadow of pandemic policy. Take the vaccines for example.

Yes, the vaccine mandates are now over. Many people chose to get the vaccines. Many chose not to get them. But soon, there may not be a choice – at least, not if you want to eat.

The next big product being developed is “edible vaccines.” These are food products which can have the effect of a vaccination when you eat them. You might remember, I did an episode a while back looking at many of the scientific papers on this.

But now there’s a new one. A group of Chinese scientists has found they can relay mRNA vaccines using cow’s milk. The paper describes how they were able to vaccinate mice using this new mRNA milk.

Dr. Peter McCullough expressed his concerns over this new development on his Substack page. He said it now means “The nation’s food supply can be manipulated by public health agencies to influence population outcomes.” While he acknowledged this is a big jump for science, it could also present a new health threat given the side effects we’re now seeing from mRNA vaccines.

He wrote, “For those who have taken one of the COVID-19 vaccines, having milk vaccines as an EUA offering would allow even more loading of the body with synthetic mRNA … These observations lead me to conclude that mRNA technology has just entered a whole new, much darker phase of development.”

The health issues are known. Including with mRNA vaccines, and milk. There were even documented dangers with mRNA vaccines and human breast milk.

It turned out that for women who had received the mRNA vaccines for COVID-19, elements of those vaccines were benign transmitted in their breast milk, and this was even harming their babies, if they had nursing infants.

This wasn’t properly communicated to people in the early days of the mandates. Many women got the vaccines believing they were completely “safe and effective.” When in reality they were not.

The CDC later acknowledged this on its website. It states, “Recent reports have shown that breastfeeding people who have received mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have antibodies in their breastmilk, which could help protect their babies. More data are needed to determine what level of protection these antibodies may provide to the baby.”

Then we found out that some of the companies even knew this. The Pfizer documents, for example, described experiments they did with the mRNA shots on pregnant and nursing women. And we only know this because Pfizer was forced to release the data under a FOIA request.

On page 12 of the document, it notes a test done on 270 pregnant mothers. It says that 23 of them lost their babies through “spontaneous abortion.” Some had premature births, others had neonatal death. And most just had no data at all. The report says “no outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies.” We don’t even know what happened.

Another test was done on 133 breastfeeding mothers. Among these there were 17 cases where the infant developed a health issue, 3 of which it said were serious.

So, it was known that if a pregnant woman got the COVID shot, there was a chance of killing her baby. It was known that if a woman was breastfeeding, there was a chance the infant could be harmed. Were they all told this ahead of time? Were employees at companies with vaccine mandates informed of this? How many women and babies were harmed by this? Well, maybe if justice is served, we’ll eventually find out.

That’s all for tonight, folks. Thanks for joining us for this new version of Crossroads on weeknights at 7PM eastern on EpochTV.com. In the next couple of weeks, we will be adding interviews and more segments to the show, so stay tuned for that. And then starting May 15th, we will be broadcasting simultaneously on both EpochTV.com and NTD cable. For updates, follow us on social media @crossroads_josh. And as always, Stay informed, and stay free.