It was reportedly the meetings that Durham and Attorney General William Barr recently had in Rome—where they obtained new evidence—that were the impetus for the broadening of the scope of the probe.

The agents and officials running the probe, however, seemed impervious to the deluge of evidence contradicting their premise.

On the heels of the Durham Report, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) has written Attorney General Merrick Garland demanding answers about an ongoing special counsel investigation into former President Donald Trump.

Fusion GPS then hired Steele and his firm to probe Trump's alleged ties to Russia.

That information was uncovered by Durham during his probe of the FBI and other intelligence activities during that election.

House Judiciary Republicans requested congressional testimony from Special Counsel John Durham, whose investigative report on the FBI’s 2016-2017 probe into the Trump campaign was published on Monday.

But the Durham Report described the FBI's top expert on Russian intelligence as finding no such evidence.

Durham’s review later turned into a criminal probe, which remains ongoing. His appointment ensures that the probe can continue into the next presidency. Barr on Dec. 21 told reporters that Durham is “making good progress” in the investigation.

In October 2020, Barr appointed Durham as special counsel on the investigation, which, after three years, led to Monday’s report concluding that senior FBI agents "displayed a serious lack of analytical rigor towards the information that they received

Durham was tasked with looking into the origins of the probe into possible collusion between President Donald Trump's campaign and Russia.

Special counsel John Durham testified before the House Judiciary Committee on the morning of June 21 about his report on the FBI’s handling of the 2016 Trump-Russia investigation.

Attorney John Durham filed the first charge of his criminal inquiry on Aug. 14 against the primary FBI attorney assigned to provide legal support to the special counsel team led by Robert Mueller, casting a shadow over the 22-month probe that roiled the

The Durham probe has reportedly turned into a criminal investigation and expanded in scope. The Australian government publicly acknowledged cooperation with the probe in an Oct. 2 letter to Sen.

After three years of investigations, special counsel John Durham has released the report on the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane probe into former President Donald Trump. Florida Gov.

While Durham may be scrutinizing Brennan's activities around the launch of the Russia probe, there is no indication of any wrongdoing on the part of the former CIA chief. Then-CIA Director John Brennan in Washington, on Sept. 28, 2016.

Durham was appointed in October 2020 by then-Attorney General William Barr to conduct an independent inquiry of whether the law was violated by investigators in the Trump-Russia probe, which the FBI internally dubbed “Crossfire Hurricane.”

(Teng Chen/The Epoch Times) The Durham Report In 2019, Durham was tasked with investigating the origins of the FBI's probe into allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia to sway the 2016 election.

And Durham was to probe for evidence that any of "the actions of any FBI personnel or third parties relating to the Crossfire Hurricane investigation violated any federal criminal statutes, including the prohibition against making false statements to

The Durham Report, released in May 2023, was the result of a four-year investigation led by Durham into the FBI's probe of alleged ties between Trump's 2016 campaign and Russia.

Bill Barr did this for political reasons," Durham said, starting to address critics of his work for the first time. But, Durham said, the jury should reflect on how his appointment came about.

In an earlier review, Horowitz concluded that the Clinton-email probe was clouded by anti-Trump and pro-Clinton bias expressed in messages by FBI personnel.

According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O.

Garland most recently testified before the committee in October 2021, when lawmakers questioned the FBI and DOJ's handling of the Nassar investigation, the Durham probe, and concerns regarding Chinese espionage investigations, among others.

In response, Joe Gaeta, deputy assistant attorney general, defended the hiring of Hennessey and said she's not involved with the probe, given that Durham is utilizing his own staff.

The next segment of the video deals with the John Durham probe.

In May 2023, a final investigation into the Crossfire Hurricane operation by Special Counsel John Durham concluded that the probe was "seriously deficient" and that agents involved in the case had been driven by "confirmation bias" in pursuing the investigation

Barr, who has defended the probe, said he was disappointed by the acquittals but optimistic about the upcoming report. Garland has said before that he wants "as much as possible" of the Durham report to be made public.

"We were denied access to the information during the John Durham probe, so there is a real problem with the special counsel," Johnson said. He did not elaborate. The Epoch Times has contacted the Department of Justice for comment.

What does Sussmann’s acquittal mean for the Durham probe? And what could have influenced this outcome? Former Congressman Devin Nunes weighs in. House Democrats are introducing a multi-part bill aimed at gun control.

In the next segment of the video, the host asks Grenell to talk about the plot against Trump and the Durham probe into the Russia investigation.