Court Rules NY Stop-and-Frisk Police Practice Unconstitutional

In this Friday, May 17, 2013, photo, U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin is interviewed in her federal court chambers, in New York. Scheindlin is the federal judge presiding over civil rights challenges to the stop-and-frisk practices of the New York Police Department. Her decision Aug. 12 in favor of the plaintiffs, ruled stop-and-frisk tactics of the New York Police Department violated the constitutional rights of New Yorkers. (AP Photo/Richard Drew)

By Joshua Philipp

Joshua Philipp

Joshua Philipp is senior investigative reporter and host of “Crossroads” at The Epoch Times. As an award-winning journalist and documentary filmmaker, his works include “The Real Story of January 6” (2022), “The Final War: The 100 Year Plot to Defeat America” (2022), and “Tracking Down the Origin of Wuhan Coronavirus” (2020).

View profile

August 12, 2013Updated: July 18, 2015

biggersmaller

A New York City federal judge ruled that the city’s stop-and-frisk policy is a violation of the Fourth and the 14th amendments of the U.S. Constitution.

The ruling states the burden on the plaintiff caused by the stop-and-frisk policy “far outweighs the administrative hardships the NYPD will face in correcting its unconstitutional practices.”

As part of the ruling from Judge Shira A. Scheindlin, said she would designate an outside lawyer to monitor the NYPD and ensure they stay within legal boundaries of the Constitution.

[tok id=121cab1692260dd8cf71452981e39f21 partner=1966]

Epoch Share