Book Recommendation

A Rare Study of the Civil War’s Amphibious Invasions

BY Dustin Bass TIMEApril 24, 2026 PRINT

When the Civil War is discussed, it is typically about land warfare, like those famous battles of Gettysburg, Antietam, or Fort Donelson, where Ulysses S. Grant earned the nickname “Unconditional Surrender Grant.” There are several naval battles that stand out, specifically the Battle of Hampton Roads (also known as Battle of Ironclads) and the Battle of Mobile Bay where Adm. David Farragut famously proclaimed “Damn the Torpedoes! Full speed ahead!”

But what about the battles of the in-between? Where land warfare and naval battles meet? British-born Ron Field, historian of the American military, has recently written a study of these battles in his “American Civil War Amphibious Tactics,” He’s highlighted some of the more important Union offensives of the war.

Field begins in August 1861 with the amphibious invasion of Hatteras Inlet, an estuary of North Carolina, and suggests that a Union victory was pivotal for maintaining the waning morale of the Union due to the recent defeat at the First Battle of Bull Run.

The invasion was nearly a disaster as less than half of the troops were able to disembark and arrive at the inlet due to the rough seas. Despite the underwhelming numbers, Field notes that the Confederates, having seen so many vessels, assumed they possessed superior numbers with the invasion, and thus surrendered. The miscalculation was costly as the Confederates lost two forts in the process.

Epoch Times Photo
The Union fleet bombards Fort Hatteras. (Public Domain)

Adding Color

The author pulls several colorful quotes from the journals of soldiers, a rather common, but appreciated theme in the short book. He also thankfully leaves the grammar and spelling as it was written, like the entry of Marine private, Daniel O’Connor, who wrote,

“Bang bang was the order of the day for 1 hour and 1/2 we fired as hard as we could throwing shel in to the enemys battery like showers of hail. … We spliced the main brace & drank Uncle Sams health. … We made some splinded shots.”

Along with the number of colorful quotes in the book, Field’s study was illustrated by Steve Noon, a very fine artist. Of the many Osprey books I’ve read, Noon’s artwork may be the best. He paid close attention to the details of the invading soldiers and the types of vessels that brought the men to shore, whether row boats, gunboats, or side-wheel steamers.

Invasions and the Forces

Along with the invasion of Hatteras Inlet, the book follows a number of other Union charges, including the invasion of Roanoke Island and New Bern in February and March 1862, respectively.

Regarding Roanoke, the author expressed its importance, stating,

“The capture of Roanoke Island opened up eastern North Carolina to Union invasion. By the summer of 1862, the port cities of Plymouth, Elizabeth City, New Bern, Washington, Edenton, and Hertford in North Carolina, plus Norfolk, Virginia, were under Union control and largely remained so until the end of the Civil War.”

As for the importance of New Bern, the author notes that after its capture, it became the Union’s headquarters in eastern North Carolina.

Field hones in a little closer in his study by presenting several fighting forces for the Union—the First New York Marine Artillery, the Mississippi Marine Brigade, and the Fleet Brigade. The latter combined Marines and sailors during the siege of Charleston, South Carolina.

These groups were somewhat successful, but, at least in the book, far more memorable. The New York force witnessed an approximate 150-man mutiny due to lack of pay and the fact they hadn’t received their enlistment bounty.

Field helps the reader envision the soldiers’ additional frustrations by quoting a newspaper reporter who had witnessed the soldiers struggling to maneuver a boat-howitzer on land. “Every strap and buckle seemed to have got in its wrong place, and ‘all fingers were thumbs,’” the New York Daily Tribune reporter comically wrote. “Some would give up the job as a bad one, and damn the horses and ‘horse tackle’ in the roughest of expletives.”

Succinct, Yet Detailed

Field’s succinct study of the Union’s amphibious efforts, which included Marines, sailors, and soldiers, details immense heroism and daring, failures, and near disasters. All these elements culminate in Field’s final section about the attack on Fort Fisher near Wilmington, North Carolina.

There were actually two attacks. The unsuccessful effort on Christmas Day 1864 witnessed Maj. Gen. Benjamin Butler’s removal from command; and the successful Jan. 15 effort in which numerous Union soldiers received the Medal of Honor award for their heroic actions.

According to the author, these amphibious tactics orchestrated and conducted by the Union Army and Navy laid the groundwork for future American amphibious tactics, including efforts during both world wars, as well as the war in Vietnam.

“American Civil War Amphibious Tactics” is a brief yet interesting military study on moments in the Civil War that often are overlooked. For those interested in this topic, it is a good read with exceptional illustrations. I wish the work included battle maps of the movements of troops and ships, which Osprey typically offers, but that is my singular complaint.

Epoch Times Photo

‘American Civil War Amphibious Tactics’
By Ron Field and Steve Noon
Osprey Publishing: June 17, 2025
Paperback, 64 pages

What arts and culture topics would you like us to cover? Please email ideas or feedback to features@epochtimes.nyc.

Dustin Bass is the creator and host of the “American Tales” podcast and cofounder of “The Sons of History.” He writes two weekly series for The Epoch Times: Profiles in History and This Week in History. He is also an author.
You May Also Like