The SupremeCourt ruled 6–3 in Louisiana v. Callais that the state’s redrawn congressional map was unconstitutional because race was the predominant factor in drawing the lines.
Six or more of the nine SupremeCourt justices declined to take up the case after a federal district court and an appeals court ruled against the parents.
No justices disclosed their vote count.
The SupremeCourt on April 27 summarily reversed a lower court ruling that blocked Texas from implementing its mid-decade redistricting of the state's congressional map.
SupremeCourt hears oral arguments in Cisco Systems Inc. v. Doe I to determine whether U.S. corporations can be held liable for “aiding and abetting” human rights abuses committed by foreign governments.
Jarkesy, we agree with AT&T,” the circuit court said.
Verizon said in its SupremeCourt petition that “the FCC scheme at issue here mirrors the SEC scheme rejected in Jarkesy in every material respect.”
The SupremeCourt has halted Louisiana’s redistricting plan, calling it racial gerrymandering. We break down the ruling and what it means for other states.
SupremeCourt justices on April 20 declined to take up a case involving a Massachusetts schoolgirl whose parents say officials wrongly hid their daughter's purported identity as a male from them.
SupremeCourt hears the following back-to-back oral arguments in two high-stakes cases involving digital privacy and corporate liability at 10 a.m. ET on April 27.
1. Chatrie v.
SupremeCourt hears oral arguments in Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe I (24-856) to determine if American corporations can be held liable for “aiding and abetting” human rights abuses committed by foreign governments.
The SupremeCourt reversed a contrary ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and sent the case back to that court “for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
Supreme Court's decision to take it up.
Let's go through the details together.
Views expressed in this video are opinions of the host and the guest, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
The SupremeCourt hears arguments in Sripetch v. SEC (25-466) to consider whether the Securities and Exchange Commission can seek disgorgement without proving investor harm at 10 a.m. ET on April 20.
The court did not explain its decision. No justices dissented. The court disposed of the case summarily without hearing oral arguments.
The SupremeCourt also vacated the convictions and sent the case back to the U.S.
SupremeCourt and possibly in another state.
“Federal courts are supposed to let me keep practicing, and the U.S. SupremeCourt has allowed me to continue practicing, even while I've been placed on inactive status [in] California,” he said.
SupremeCourt has just issued a new landmark ruling. Specifically, in an 8-to-1 decision, the SupremeCourt found that Colorado’s ban on “conversion therapy” is unconstitutional—and violates the first amendment rights of Christian therapists.
