The Nor’easter: To Wal-Mart or Not to Wal-Mart

By Evan Mantyk
Evan Mantyk
Evan Mantyk
Evan Mantyk teaches history and literature in New York. He is also president and editor of the Society of Classical Poets.
March 1, 2011Updated: October 1, 2015

WAL-MART MISSING IN NYC: The Wal-Mart logo is displayed on the exterior of a Wal-Mart store in Oakland, Calif., in this file photo. While New York City is the biggest city in the country, it is the only major metropolis without a Wal-Mart. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
WAL-MART MISSING IN NYC: The Wal-Mart logo is displayed on the exterior of a Wal-Mart store in Oakland, Calif., in this file photo. While New York City is the biggest city in the country, it is the only major metropolis without a Wal-Mart. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
For many Americans, Wal-Mart is a relatively mundane topic. It’s where you go to get a value pack of diapers and a gallon of milk. Not so for New Yorkers.

At a recent City Council hearing condemning Wal-Mart, protesters could be seen outside holding anti-“Ground Zero Mosque” signs in one hand and pro-Wal-Mart signs in the other.

While New York City is the biggest city in the country, it is the only major metropolis without a Wal-Mart. Are New Yorkers blessed or cursed? Depends on who you ask.

Last month, Wal-Mart made clear its most aggressive attempt yet to get into New York City, setting up a website and sending out mailers focused on winning over the city. Since then, the City Council has held two hearings focused on condemning Wal-Mart, saying that the world’s biggest company hurts small businesses and creates fewer and lower-paying jobs than the ones it takes away.

Wal-Mart did not accept an invitation to attend either hearing. Wal-Mart says that without a store actually in the city or a location even announced they did not see a reason to attend.

You can feel tension in the city air.

In fact, the whole discussion is over-hyped. While the City Council does have say on certain lots of land, there are others that Wal-Mart could move into with no special approval from the city required. In particular, there is a large commercial development in Brooklyn, where rumors are flying over the possibility of a new Wal-Mart.

The same liberties built into the foundations of our country that ensure the Ground Zero Mosque could move forward despite large scale protests are the same that ensure Wal-Mart can set up a store where it has a right to.

There are genuine issues raised for and against Wal-Mart, but to tackle them involves a shift in perspective. First, it must be recognized that it is not some foreign entity. We are Americans, this is our country, and this is a product of our country, like it or not.

Last year, New Yorkers spent more than $195 million at Wal-Mart stores outside the city. New Yorkers are the top metro market for Wal-Mart.com in the country—maybe because they don’t have their own store to go to. Also, many New Yorkers already commute outside the city to work at Wal-Mart stores located in surrounding areas. Wal-Mart is already part of New Yorkers’ lives.

If the City Council and other Wal-Mart foes want to really take on Wal-Mart, they need to address the underlying issues that span society rather than focusing all of their attention on Wal-Mart.

If Wal-Mart is destructive to small business, aren’t Target, Kmart, and Costco stores that are already in the city also destructive?

Are Wal-Mart’s wages really too low? It is easy to find lower paying jobs in the city, just check out the local McDonald’s.

To me, the scariest thing about Wal-Mart is the fact that it’s destroying the U.S. manufacturing sector with cheap products made in China, where a communist regime has its economic pedal to the metal and is rolling over its own people in the process. Yet, other big box stores carry the same China-made products. The City Council’s hearing should be on buying and supporting American-made goods, not on specifically condemning Wal-Mart.

Unwisely, Wal-Mart also views itself as a foreign entity—though it won’t tell you that. If it really thought of itself as a member of the community in New York City it would have showed up to the City Council hearings and, if nothing else, offered a kind ear to the concerned community. Not showing up was a mistake.

We’ll see if New York City will forgive them.

evan.mantyk@epochtimes.com