Minimum Wage Hikes in China May Help Some, but They Will Fail to Answer the Economy’s Needs

By Milton Ezrati
Milton Ezrati
Milton Ezrati
Milton Ezrati is a contributing editor at The National Interest, an affiliate of the Center for the Study of Human Capital at the University at Buffalo (SUNY), and chief economist for Vested, a New York-based communications firm. Before joining Vested, he served as chief market strategist and economist for Lord, Abbett & Co. He also writes frequently for City Journal and blogs regularly for Forbes. His latest book is “Thirty Tomorrows: The Next Three Decades of Globalization, Demographics, and How We Will Live.”
October 12, 2026Updated: October 12, 2026

Commentary

Chinese provinces have announced increases in their statutory minimum wages. Most are significant. 

These moves may offer a boon to some households at the lower end of the country’s income distribution, but as support for renewed growth in consumer spending, the effort is small beer at best.

All 31 provincial-level regions in China have decided on some kind of minimum wage increase, with more than half opting for double-digit hikes. Guangdong has offered a 16.6 percent hike, while Shanxi has offered a 10.3 percent increase. Even the less-than-prosperous Xinjiang region has settled on a 10 percent increase

In one respect, these increases are striking. Just about all exceed the rise in the cost of living, which averaged less than 1.0 percent over the past 12 months. 

More significant, perhaps, is that the scheduled hikes exceed the 5.2 percent growth in average after-tax per-capita income for the year ended in the first half of 2026, the most recent period for which official figures are available. And there would seem to be room for more such generosity. 

Minimum wages before these recent increases averaged 25 to 30 percent of average monthly earnings, and the recent hikes hardly close the gap to the 40 percent international average.

For all this drama and potential, there is reason to doubt how much impact these moves will have on overall Chinese consumer spending. After all, only about 18 percent of urban workers are paid the minimum wage. 

That is a small portion of the buying population to change the entire picture of Chinese consumer choices between spending and saving, especially since the low end of the income distribution, where the minimum wage is more the norm, has less effect on the overall pattern than the high end and the middle of the distribution. 

Nor is it apparent that these minimum wage workers will spend all their newfound income. They are just as susceptible, if not more so, to the insecurities and lack of confidence that contribute to the overall preference among Chinese consumers for saving and holding back.

If this were not enough to blunt the impact of these statutory hikes, the rise in labor costs will likely prompt employment declines among this class of workers. Chinese employers—especially smaller businesses and those that produce low-margin, labor-intensive products—are already complaining of how costs are squeezing them. And these are the sorts of companies that tend to employ minimum-wage workers. 

The statutory wage hikes might well drive some of these troubled companies out of business or force others to cut back on their lowest-margin products. In either case, some of these minimum-wage workers will be laid off, at which point they will have no wage, regardless of the statutory figure. 

In the longer run, as the evidence from many economies shows, such cutbacks are followed, at least for the companies that survive, by efforts to use equipment and practices to replace the now more expensive minimum-wage workers—moves that will make the job losses more permanent even if a pickup in economic activity relieves employers’ cost squeezes.

Whatever the hopes and aims of provincial governments and central authorities in Beijing, it should be apparent that these minimum-wage increases are no answer to China’s need to increase the dynamism and size of its consumer sector and its domestic economy generally. 

Such developments are the only way to relieve the economy’s present extreme dependence on exports and the danger posed by the increasingly restive overseas response to the flood of Chinese exports. Beijing and the provinces will need bolder and bigger actions to meet this need. 

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.