President Joe Biden has laid out a series of potential Supreme Court reforms on July 29, intensifying an already controversial issue before the 2024 election.

A state court denied bail on July 23 for an Oklahoma man whose murder conviction the U.S. Supreme Court overturned earlier this year.

The Supreme Court could rule on the application at any time.

The Washington state Supreme Court reversed a lower court ruling that had vacated the verdict in a 2021 trial over claims brought by three teachers at Sky Valley Education Center in Monroe, Washington.

The Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the D.C. Circuit, sending the case back to that court “for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Supreme Court sided 5–4 on April 2 with a truck driver who was fired after failing a drug test following consumption of a pain-relief product marketed as drug-free.

The Supreme Court on May 27 ordered a lower court to take another look at whether a Minnesota police officer may be sued for using excessive force during a riot. The Supreme Court’s decision in Bauer v. Marks took the form of an unsigned order.

The farm's lawyer, Umar Sheikh, has said the Supreme Court of Canada has an "extremely high threshold" to meet for cases it will hear.

The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the case by the end of June.

The Missouri Supreme Court upheld the conviction and sentence on Aug. 13, 2013.

Trump's appeal to the Supreme Court came just days after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected his request that it stay the orders from the district court in a 2-1 decision.

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 2 in Thornburg v. Gingles (1986).

In a March 10 brief, the CPSC urged the Supreme Court to reject the appeal.

The Supreme Court should vacate the Ninth Circuit’s ruling and send the case back to that court with instructions to dismiss the appeal, the brief said.

In a unanimous vote announced on March 26, a panel of Supreme Court justices accepted charges brought by the Prosecutor General’s Office.

The public does have the right to wild camp on Dartmoor, the Supreme Court has ruled.

President Donald Trump said on Sept. 2 that the government will ask the Supreme Court tomorrow to expedite review of a federal appeals court ruling that struck down most of his reciprocal tariffs.

In 2002, the Supreme Court interpreted the amendment as prohibiting executions of individuals who were intellectually disabled.

The Supreme Court on Nov. 22 agreed to hear an appeal by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) of a circuit court ruling that struck down an $8-billion-a-year broadband subsidy. The top court’s new decision in FCC v.

Supreme Court would scrap the appeals court order. “The dissent was very, very strong," he said, adding that it "provides a road map for the Supreme Court.”

Supreme Court awarded Aboriginal land title to the Cowichan Tribes on Aug. 7 for roughly 750 acres of land in Richmond, B.C.

The Supreme Court is expected to rule on FDA v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. by the end of June.

"That’s why I think I’m going to go to the Supreme Court to watch," he said.

“Polling shows Kansans overwhelmingly prefer voting on Supreme Court Justices to the status quo. Seventy-four percent support the direct election of Supreme Court Justices, while only 20 percent like the current attorney-controlled system.”

Supreme Court, the application states. This means that the officers are out of options in the Washington state courts, and this realization prompted their latest application to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Sauer could have asked the Supreme Court to delve deeper into the constitutional issues, but he did not.

Court of International Trade in New York and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington ruled earlier this year that Trump’s import taxes are illegal, prompting the administration to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court issued a ruling recently on “ghost guns.” Specifically, this new decision from the court upheld a Biden-era rule regulating which guns can and cannot be constructed from individual components at home.

The Supreme Court hears arguments on whether the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act violates the Constitution’s guarantee of due process.

The North Carolina Supreme Court had agreed in June 2024 to consider the appeals after the North Carolina Court of Appeals found in April that there was no evidence to support the decision of then-Gov.