In July, the Supreme Court broadened the scope of immunity enjoyed by presidents in response to an appeal from Trump.

Episode Resources: 🔵 Supreme Court Ruling: https://bit.ly/3VcBQVa 🔵 Case Breakdown: https://bit.ly/42aKyqX

Supreme Court ordered a lower court this week to reconsider a labor dispute in light of a June ruling that overturned a longstanding legal doctrine favoring federal agencies.

The court denied both requests on April 7, prompting the Trump administration to turn to the Supreme Court in an effort to block the order before the midnight deadline.

Supreme Court has allowed a Republican congressman to challenge a state election law. The decision is highly consequential in the precedent that it sets.

Supreme Court was asked to issue a ruling on whether citizens can enforce the Voting Rights Act after a court ruled that the government is the only entity that can enforce the law.

The Trump administration is asking the Supreme Court to block a lower court order restricting the ability of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to deport illegal immigrants to nations other than their home countries.

In the process, that appeals court “employed a vague, permissive, and jargon-laden rule that departed from the standard” the Supreme Court used in Tinker, he said.

Nvidia filed a petition with the Supreme Court on March 4, which the justices granted without comment on June 17. On July 13, the court scheduled oral arguments for Nov. 13.

In its unsigned opinion, the Supreme Court seemed concerned that the federal government would face irreparable harm if it were forced to disburse the grants.

"The Supreme Court just acknowledged this in a 6 to 3 decision invalidating Trump’s bump-stock ban." Gun rights groups celebrated the decision.

Others with standing could still challenge the FDA’s actions in court after the June 13 decision. The Supreme Court’s decision reversed a hold for the U.S.

Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court granted the petition in Diamond Alternative Energy LLC v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in an unsigned order. The court did not explain its decision. No justices dissented.

The party said in a social media post that the Ohio Supreme Court, which has a majority of Republican justices, "is a rubber stamp for the Ohio GOP’s out-of-touch agenda."

However, Evnen and Hilgers were unable to secure enough support from the Nebraska Supreme Court on the constitutional question.

The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the case by June 2025.

In the new opinion, the Supreme Court vacated the decision of the Fifth Circuit and returned it to that court for reconsideration.

“The Supreme Court of the United States is not allowing me to do what I was elected to do,” he wrote. “This is a bad and dangerous day for America.”

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the conservative majority on the Court is overturning so many longstanding precedents so quickly that public confidence in it is flagging.

Supreme Court on May 22 voted 4–4 to reject authorization for the nation’s first publicly funded religious charter school.

Supreme Court will agree.”

On Oct. 20, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) granted Murthy’s application for stay (pause) of the injunction, until the court could review the case and issue a judgement. In the Supreme Court On March 18, 2024, Murthy v.

Solicitor General Sarah Harris urged the Supreme Court to allow the retrial of the applicants to move forward. The applicants are “incorrect” when they claim that the Supreme Court “is likely to grant review.”

Episode Resources: 🔵 Supreme Court Decision: https://bit.ly/4cvHJEE

The school district filed a brief on July 8 urging the Supreme Court not to accept the case.

The Supreme Court issued an unsigned order on Dec. 6 granting the petition in Rivers v. Lumpkin. No justices dissented. The court did not explain its decision.

Supreme Court announced it would hear Phillips's initial case.

The circuit court ruling conflicts with Supreme Court precedent and decisions of other circuit courts, and the Supreme Court needs to intervene to provide clarity, the petition said.

Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed Chutkan’s ruling. The hospitals petitioned the Supreme Court on Dec. 29, 2023, questioning the meaning of the wording the court used in Becerra v.