President Donald Trump attends oral arguments on birthright citizenship at the Supreme Court Wednesday. What does the case ultimately mean for our nation?

This case hit the Supreme Court last year. But back then, the court was looking at a preliminary issue—about how far judges could go in blocking Trump.

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Wednesday about Trump’s executive order to restrict birthright citizenship. The president sat in the courtroom, the first time a sitting U.S. president has attended Supreme Court oral arguments.

The Supreme Court will return on Monday for the first day of its new term.

In another win for parental rights, a school district over in Maryland was ordered to pay $1.5 million dollars to parents who weren’t allowed to pull their kids

Supreme Court hears oral arguments in the landmark case of Noem v. Al Otro Lado at 11 a.m. ET on March 24.

The Supreme Court said on March 25 that the appeals court incorrectly applied the theory of contributory liability.

A high-stakes case heads to the Supreme Court this week. Justices are set to weigh whether children born in the United States automatically obtain U.S. citizenship.

The Department of Justice had asked the Supreme Court on March 11 to allow it to end TPS for Haitians and Syrians after an appeals court blocked the move.

The Supreme Court is expected to issue a ruling on the case by the end of June.

“After losing at the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal, we now stand ready to present our arguments before the Supreme Court of Canada,” the CCFR said in a March 19 statement.

The federal government argues in its application to the Supreme Court that the lower courts made an error when concluding the requirement of a “national emergency” was not met.

The Supreme Court honors the late Justice Sandra Day O’Connor with a meeting of the Supreme Court’s Bar, featuring remarks by Solicitor General D. John Sauer, retired Arizona Supreme Court Chief Justice Ruth McGregor, chief judge of the U.S.

The Supreme Court seemed poised on March 24 to accept the Trump administration's argument that the government can block asylum seekers from requesting asylum at the border.

Supreme Court on March 23 will hear Mississippi’s appeal against a lower court ruling striking down its law allowing ballots received after Election Day to be counted.

The Supreme Court hears oral arguments in the high-stakes election law case Watson v. Republican National Committee (No. 24-1260) at 10 a.m. ET on March 23 to determine the legality of counting mail-in ballots received after Election Day.

The Supreme Court was packed on Wednesday as President Donald Trump attended oral arguments on birthright citizenship. NTD's Arleen Richards was on site and has the latest. The president said Iran is now asking for a cease-fire.

Supreme Court is set to hear arguments on March 24 in a case to decide whether the government is required to allow asylum seekers to apply for asylum before they’ve crossed the border. The case, Noem v.

"That’s why the upcoming Supreme Court decision will be a true earthquake in constitutional law, no matter which way the Supreme Court rules."

The Supreme Court accepted Mississippi’s appeal and scheduled oral arguments for March 23.

The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to halt lower courts' attempts to access information about the inner workings of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

At the outset of Wednesday’s Supreme Court hearing, some of the justices seemed skeptical of Olivier’s claim in light of that precedent.

By correctly concluding that [the Tennessee law] warrants the ‘paradigm of judicial restraint,’ the Court reserves to the people of Tennessee the right to decide for themselves.

Zorn’s attorneys urged the Supreme Court to take up the case, arguing that the Second Circuit failed to comply with Supreme Court precedent by failing to identify a case in which an officer in similar circumstances was found to have violated the Fourth

Supreme Court seems poised to rule against Colorado’s law banning so-called “conversion therapy” for LGBT youth.

In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court said that Congress hadn’t granted judges authority to issue broad relief to individuals not before the court.

The Supreme Court issued a ruling on June 26 that could hinder Planned Parenthood’s ability to keep Medicaid dollars in states across the country. The case, known as Medina v.

Supreme Court on March 12 to take up her challenge to her ongoing suspension from an appeals court in the nation’s capital. Judge Pauline Newman, 98, of the U.S.

The Supreme Court seemed divided on Nov. 5 over whether to salvage a large portion of President Donald Trump's tariffs in the face of challenges to their legality.