The Department of Justice had asked the Supreme Court on March 11 to allow it to end TPS for Haitians after an appeals court blocked the move.

Court of International Trade on Feb. 23 to seek a full refund of payments made under Trump’s tariffs following the Supreme Court ruling.

The Supreme Court announced its 6–3 ruling on June 27, 2025, and directed the litigation of remaining issues, including any settlement, to continue in lower courts.

It would be potentially calamitous for the future of the Supreme Court as well. Does anyone think that Sen.

But the Supreme Court ruled on Feb. 20 that the law does not clearly authorize tariffs.

The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the two cases by the end of June.

Supreme Court just issued a decision that expands your right to appeal a federal prison sentence.

Mike O’Brien, counsel at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, will argue on the parents’ behalf on April 22, when their case goes before the Supreme Court as Mahmoud v. Taylor.

The president initially announced a 10 percent global tariff on Feb. 20, soon after the Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that the administration lacked authority to levy tariffs on dozens of countries under IEEPA.

Earlier this year, the Supreme Court heard arguments for both cases in a combined case called Louisiana v. Callais.

The case marks uncharted waters for the Supreme Court, which has never ruled on how far the International Emergency Economic Powers Act extends.

The Supreme Court said that the term “regular forces” in Section 12406 “likely refers to the regular forces of the United States military.”

Supreme Court will hear arguments at 10 a.m. ET on Mar. 2 in United States v. Hemani (No. 24-1234). 

Supreme Court. In a petition he filed with the court on Oct. 21, he argued that giving the Alabama governor authority to set execution dates violated the Alabama Constitution.

Several news outlets are now claiming the Supreme Court has just greenlit racial profiling for authorities searching for illegal aliens. But is this really the case? We’ll have a look at the actual ruling and what it says.

The Supreme Court heard the long-awaited case on the legality of President Donald Trump’s tariffs, and its decision fell somewhere in the middle. Trump is now expanding the tariffs using other methods.

He and his staff knew for sure that this claim would be subject to litigation and likely rejected by lower courts. But they also believed that forcing the Supreme Court to intervene was worth the risk.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned this week that a Supreme Court ruling against the administration's widespread use of tariffs could cause a "big loss" to the United States.

The school district filed a brief Oct. 1, urging the Supreme Court to dismiss the emergency application.

The Tennessee Supreme Court reversed, finding that the public sees custom plates as government speech.

The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the case by the end of June 2026.

Lawyers for the district told Supreme Court justices that they should not accept the petition.

But Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett's new book, "Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and Constitution," can help. Barrett set out to write a book about the Supreme Court seen through the lens of her own experience.

The Supreme Court decided on Oct. 10 to consider whether a Texas man may challenge his sentence for fraud even though he waived his right to appeal in a plea agreement with prosecutors. Munson P.

Decades later, the Supreme Court in 1898 ruled 6–2 in United States v.

Given the margin of error for IQ tests, the court said Smith's score could actually be as low as 69. It pointed to another Supreme Court decision—Hall v.

Salazar urged the Supreme Court to deny the NBA’s petition in a brief he filed with the court, arguing that the Second Circuit’s ruling was correct.

The Supreme Court is likely to strike down federal limits restricting political parties from coordinating spending with candidates, legal experts told The Epoch Times.

Supreme Court on Dec. 4 ordered that the state’s efforts to redefine its electoral maps in favor of Republicans were purely partisan and not racially discriminatory, as had been ruled by a lower court. On Nov. 18, a three-judge panel in U.S.

In both cases, the Supreme Court held that the plaintiffs didn't have standing. In calling for reform, Biden said the Supreme Court was "mired in a crisis of ethics."