The Push to ‘Make DC Square Again’

A few months ago, Max Moore and his allies were voices in the social media wilderness.

Their campaign to “Make DC Square Again”—an effort to return Virginia’s Arlington County and city of Alexandria to the District of Columbia—was getting likes and reposts on X amid a redistricting battle in the state. But social media is not quite reality.

Things got a little more real on April 21, when Virginia voters greenlit a congressional map redrawn by their Democrat-dominated legislature. Many districts are anchored in slivers of deep-blue northern Virginia, including Arlington and Alexandria, jeopardizing the reelection prospects of multiple House Republicans.

One day later, Rep. Rich McCormick (R-Ga.) introduced legislation to repeal the 1840s retrocession that delivered the other side of the Potomac River to the Commonwealth of Virginia.

Any bid to restore the district’s original borders would have to overcome many hurdles, not least the opposition of locals who would lose representation in Congress. Even if it happened, it probably would not be enough to make Virginia a red state.

However, ahead of fiercely contested midterms, some Republicans see an opportunity to undo an old but questionable law and blunt the Democrats’ advance—a motivation in line with the long and often partisan battle over the District of Columbia and its borders. If President Donald Trump gets involved, the stakes could be raised further on an issue the courts have never resolved.

Moore, for his part, struck an optimistic note.

“I’m feeling pretty good,” he told The Epoch Times in a text message after the legislation was introduced.

Cosponsored by Reps. Earl “Buddy” Carter (R-Ga.) and Randy Fine (R-Fla.), McCormick’s bill was quickly referred to multiple committees.

Influential conservatives who back the idea now include Kevin Roberts, president of The Heritage Foundation, and Mike Howell, president of the Oversight Project, a government watchdog group.

Many local politicians were not thrilled.

“I, and every other sane person, oppose this,” wrote Paul Strauss—the Democratic senior shadow senator for the District of Columbia whose role entails lobbying for statehood, told The Epoch Times in an email, 

Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District of Columbia’s Democratic non-voting delegate to the House of Representatives, wrote on X that the proposal would amount to “disenfranchising hundreds of thousands of Virginia residents by making them D.C. residents without their input—or D.C.’s.”

In a video posted to X, Alexandria Mayor Alyia Gaskins described the idea as “absolutely ridiculous,” calling it an effort to “rewrite how this democracy is supposed to work.”

Nick Murray, a local activist for the “Make DC Square Again” movement, conceded that success was far from guaranteed, at least in the short term.

Even as a Republican-controlled Congress weighs the proposal, he sees a faster route to restoring the District of Columbia’s original borders—ones changed at least in part against the backdrop of Virginia’s 1840s slave trade.

“Although it seems unlikely that this will be fixed soon, all ‘DC Squarehood’ requires is an executive order,” he wrote in a text message to The Epoch Times.

Roger Pilon, founder of the Cato Institute’s Center for Constitutional Studies, sounded less sure of the feasibility of that path.

“Where’s the authority on the part of the president to issue an executive order?” he asked. “That’s a serious question right there.”

Yet Pilon, who has repeatedly testified to Congress on the issue of D.C. statehood, agreed with activists that Congress never had the authority to retrocede the Virginia portion of the district in the first place.

Pilon said he sees Trump as the likeliest president to force the issue, despite the political risks of stripping thousands of Virginians of political power.

“He takes on things that nobody thought any president would take on,” Pilon said. “But even this is perhaps a stretch too far.”

Congress formally organized the District of Columbia from portions of Virginia and Maryland in 1801, building on an authority laid out in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution and the Residence Act of 1790.

Moore’s American Capital Project describes that constitutional language as “a one-way ratchet.” On that argument, Congress never had the authority to give back the territory it received.

Alexandrians pushed for retrocession in the 1830s and 1840s. They cited poor treatment and infrastructure relative to those on the other side of the Potomac, as well as their lack of rights.

In 1846, after the Virginia General Assembly gave the nod to retrocession, the U.S. House and Senate passed a retrocession act. Then came a referendum in Alexandria and Alexandria County—now Arlington County. Citizens of the county accused Alexandrians of fraud, claiming that they acted in secret.

President James K. Polk issued a proclamation affirming the result of that referendum.

In the succeeding decades, Presidents Abraham Lincoln and Howard Taft both mulled the reversal of retrocession.

Revived by a heavily Republican Congress after the Civil War and Lincoln’s assassination, according to Richards, the 1860s proposal eventually fell flat in the Senate as the South regained some political power during Reconstruction.

Taft’s push during the 1910s likewise failed to gain traction.

—Nathan Worcester

BOOKMARKS

U.S. forces will “help free up” ships trapped in the Strait of Hormuz starting on Monday morning, President Donald Trump said. The Epoch Times’ Jacki Thrapp reported that countries from across the world had asked the United States to help move the stranded ships, according to Trump. 

Today, the Christ Church in the City of Boston is home to a thriving Episcopal congregation. It’s also best known for its role in the American Revolution. The Epoch Times’ Lawrence Wilson reported on the church’s role during the early days of the conflict as the 250th anniversary of American Independence draws closers.  

A federal appeals court has upheld a Texas law requiring the display of the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms, The Epoch Times’ Matthew Vadum reported. In a 9–8 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit said in Nathan v. Alamo Heights Independent School District that the law complied with the First Amendment, despite a contrary ruling it issued last year.

The bullet that hit a Secret Service agent just outside of the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner was fired by the gunman and was not friendly fire, says Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia. The Epoch Times’ Jacki Thrapp reported that the suspect, Cole Allen, is scheduled for a preliminary hearing on May 8.