Punishment Without Limits

By Matthew Mangino
Matthew Mangino
Matthew Mangino
Matthew T. Mangino is of counsel with Luxenberg, Garbett, Kelly and George, P.C. Mangino is the former district attorney of Lawrence County, Pa., and spent a six-year term on the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole. He is also an adjunct professor at Thiel College, a Creator columnist, and author of “The Executioner’s Toll, 2010.”
April 9, 2026Updated: April 12, 2026

Commentary

A new Tennessee law will make it easier for people with felony convictions to vote. For years, Tennessee prohibited former offenders who were behind on child support or court costs and fines from voting. The state legislature recently approved a measure that would permit people who have complied with child support for one year to rejoin the voting and voter rolls. In addition, the law no longer ties payment of court costs and fines to the right to vote.

According to the Prison Project, laws in 48 states ban people with felony convictions from voting. In 2022, an estimated 4.4 million Americans, representing 2 percent of the voting-age population, were ineligible to vote due to similar disenfranchisement laws or policies.

These never-ending penalties are known as collateral consequences of crime. Disenfranchising former offenders is one of a myriad of lifetime penalties piled on people convicted of felonies in this country.

Lawmakers nationwide would do well to eliminate some of the collateral consequences of a criminal conviction. A criminal record shouldn’t be a life sentence. The ever-growing list of collateral sanctions often puts former offenders in a position to fail.

A collateral sanction is a penalty, disability, or disadvantage that is related to employment or occupational licensing as a result of an offender’s conviction. The sanctions apply by operation of law, whether or not the penalty, disability, or disadvantage is included in the sentence.

According to The Council of State Governments’ Justice Center, a little less than one in three offenders released from prison are reincarcerated within three years, either committing a new crime or violating conditions of parole. While that is an improvement over numbers from a decade ago, it is still too many.

The problems with our crowded prisons are not just the result of punishing offenders for their criminal conduct—the problems are compounded by ongoing sanctions that hinder former offenders from successfully reintegrating into society.

According to a 2024 National Employment Law Project report, an estimated 80 million Americans have a criminal record. The American Bar Association (ABA) has identified more than 38,000 penalties—collateral consequences—that can affect people long after they have completed their criminal sentence.

The ABA Task Force on Collateral Consequences found that a former offender “may be ineligible for many federally funded health and welfare benefits, food stamps, public housing and federal educational assistance.” As a result, their ability to earn a living in their chosen profession may be limited in that an offender “may no longer qualify for certain employment and professional licenses.”

Collateral consequences may prohibit military service, possession of a firearm, or federal security clearance. A non-citizen may lose the right to reside in the United States.

Supporting a family is that much more difficult when employers refuse to hire former offenders. Employers may be interested in giving a person a second chance, but they are concerned that hiring a person with a criminal record might expose them to liability for negligent hiring if the person commits a crime on the job.

According to the Vera Institute of Justice, half of all states punish people who cannot pay fines and fees associated with criminal proceedings by taking away their driver’s licenses. This practice affects nearly 11 million people nationwide and diminishes their ability to secure a job, maintain stable housing, and participate in their community.

More states, as well as the federal government, need to take action to remove heavy-handed sanctions that drive up costs, increase victimization, and often doom offenders to a never-ending cycle of poverty or worse—reincarceration.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.