There is a civil-militaryfusion doctrine. If there is a military application for technology, which obviously there is here, it is exploited as much as possible. Why are we still doing this development in China?
Mr.
Nuclear power: We are the greatest civilian user of nuclear power, and we are ahead in fusion nuclear power. For military purposes, I do not want to get into that, but we have 6,000 to 7,000 nuclear weapons. China has 600 to 700.
As you say, now it's using civil-militaryfusion, that research can be misused for malevolent purposes or to advance Chinese military, to advance the modernization of Chinese military at a time when China is being increasingly aggressive and assertive
But there's this, for example, complete lack of awareness about the concept of civil-militaryfusion, which is dominant in how Chinese industry and the educational field interacts and works together. What do you think about that?
Sen.
Jekielek:
I often describe TikTok from the perspective of the Chinese Communist Party having particular influence on this app, by its own laws and also by its own policies of civil-militaryfusion.
We're going to see, as a part of this decoupling between the United States and China, that tech companies are going to be forced out of China one way or another, and that's a good thing because of this whole concept of civil-militaryfusion, which means
With civil-militaryfusion, their roll-on, roll-off ferries, the use of civilian aircraft, they have enormous capabilities, an enormous lift already. It would be hard to argue they are not designing a military capable of that specific task.
For example, the civilmilitaryfusion that the Chinese regime mandates basically, right throughout its system.
Mr. Chaillan: Yes.
Mr. Jekielek: But let's go back to what's happening here in the U.S.
Jekielek: It's astounding, and it's actually a little even more complicated, I think, because of this academic-militaryfusion situation that's basically par for the course in China but very different in the West. Can you tell me about that?
Mr.