Transnational Repression Growing ‘Unchecked’ in UK, Parliamentary Report Warns

By Lily Zhou
Lily Zhou
Lily Zhou
Lily Zhou is an Ireland-based reporter covering China news for The Epoch Times.
July 31, 2025Updated: July 31, 2025

Transnational repression by foreign governments has been growing “unchecked” in the UK, a parliamentary committee warned in a report published on July 30.

The Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) said in its report that foreign states, including Russia, China, and Iran, have targeted individuals in the UK using a range of tactics, such as surveillance, online harassment, police bounties, Interpol Red Notices, lawsuits, and assassinations.

Among a dozen foreign states accused of conducting transnational repression (TNR) in the UK, the Chinese regime “conducts the most comprehensive TNR campaign of any foreign state operating in the UK,” according to the report.

The report accuses the Chinese regime of being one of the “most prolific abusers of INTERPOL’s Notice system,” alongside Russia and Turkey.

Bahrain, Egypt, Eritrea, India, Pakistan, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates are also alleged perpetrators of TNR in the UK, the report reads.

Lord David Alton, chair of the JCHR, said in a statement that the committee is “concerned that there is a growth of foreign repression on UK soil that is going unchecked.”

“This risks undermining the UK’s ability to protect the human rights of its citizens and those who have sought safety within its borders,” he said.

According to the JCHR, MI5 ran 48 percent more state-threat investigations in 2024 than it did in 2022. The true scale of TNR—the targeting of individuals by foreign states—is unknown, because of “high amounts of underreporting of TNR-related crimes and the often-covert nature of TNR activities,” the report states.

Bounties on Exiled HK Activists

Since Beijing imposed a national security law on Hong Kong, the former UK colony has issued dozens of police warrants on exiled activists, including several UK residents. Each has a bounty of HK$1 million (US$127,000) on his or her head.

One of the UK-based activists, 20-year-old Chloe Cheung, told the JCHR in an evidence session that the bounty had taken a “devastating” mental toll on her.

She said she carries “lots of self-protection devices” with her and is immediately suspicious of any strangers trying to approach or befriend her.

Cheung told the committee that since the bounty was announced in December 2024, she had received “a barrage of sexual harassment messages and threatening comments on social media.”

She also said she had been “followed by two suspicious Chinese-ethnicity-looking men in January.”

Epoch Times Photo
Chloe Cheung, a Hong Kong activist in exile, poses for a photograph by the Houses of Parliament in London, on March 19, 2025, with other activists to mark the first anniversary of the implementation of the Hong Kong National Security Ordinance Article 23. (Adrian Dennis/AFP via Getty Images)

The JCHR said some of the wanted Hong Kong activists’ neighbors allegedly received threatening letters.

It also heard concerns over China’s unofficial police stations, which were allegedly used to monitor the Chinese diaspora and pressure some to return to China, and Beijing’s plan to build a larger embassy in London.

The committee heard that the Chinese regime uses Interpol Notices to locate individuals, before pressuring them to return to China by threatening their families.

It also heard that Russia used Interpol Red Notices and strategic lawsuits to target journalists and activists, and that the Iranian regime devised most assassination plots.

Iran has attempted to murder or kidnap a minimum of 15 UK-based individuals since 2022, according to the UK parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee, while Russia has been linked to the attempted assassination of dissidents Sergei and Yulia Skripal in 2018.

Russia and Iran are under the enhanced tier of the UK’s Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (FIRS), which took effect in July. The Labour government has not placed China under the same tier, despite pressure from some lawmakers and campaigners.

Agents of a state under the enhanced tier are required to report almost all their activities carried out at the direction of the state, while agents of other countries only have to report activities aimed at influencing political decisions, elections, or government policy.

The JCHR urged the government to add China to the enhanced tier of FIRS.

“China conducts the most comprehensive TNR campaign of any foreign state operating in the UK,” the report reads. “Its omission from the enhanced tier risks undermining the credibility and coherence of FIRS.

“Any attempt to specify only isolated parts of the Chinese state in the FIRS would fail to reflect the true nature and complexity of the threat, as influence operations span all sectors of the economy and lack clear command-and-control structures.”

In other recommendations, the committee urged the government to adopt a formal definition of TNR, collect data on TNR activities in the UK, and enhance training for police immigration officers. It also recommended the creation of a dedicated national reporting hotline, the alerting of individuals targeted by politically-motivated Red Notices, and the countering of TNR activities using the UK’s sanctioning powers and its influence at the United Nations.

Epoch Times Photo
Undated picture of the UK Home Office in London. (Yui Mok/PA)

In a statement, a Home Office spokesperson said the government takes “the threat of transnational repression extremely seriously.”

“Any attempts by a foreign state to coerce, intimidate, harass, or harm individuals on UK soil are considered a threat to our national security and sovereignty, and will not be tolerated,” the spokesperson said.

The spokesperson said the JCHR report “echoes many of the same findings and recommendations” from a report published in May by the government’s Defending Democracy Taskforce, noting that the government is “already taking action arising from those recommendations to further strengthen [its] response.”

An Interpol spokesperson said the organization has “robust processes for ensuring that all Interpol notices and diffusions comply with [its] rules.”

“Our constitution forbids Interpol from undertaking activities of a political, military, religious, or racial character, and all our databases and activities must also comply with the universal declaration for human rights,” the spokesperson said.

PA Media contributed to this report.